G. Soveral et al., WATER PERMEABILITY OF BRUSH-BORDER MEMBRANE-VESICLES FROM KIDNEY PROXIMAL TUBULE, The Journal of membrane biology, 158(3), 1997, pp. 219-228
Brush border membrane vesicles (BBMV) maintain an initial hydrostatic
pressure difference between the intra- and extravesicular medium, whic
h causes membrane strain and surface area expansion (Several, Macey &
Moura, 1997). This has not been taken into account in prior osmotic wa
ter permeability P-f-evaluations. In this paper, we find further evide
nce for the pressure in the variation of stopped-flow light scattering
traces with different vesicle preparations. Response to osmotic shock
is used to estimate water permeability in BBMV prepared with buffers
of different osmolarities (18 and 85 mosM). Data analysis includes the
dissipation of both osmotic and hydrostatic pressure gradients. P-f v
alues were of the order of 4 x 10(-3) cm sec(-1) independent of the os
molarity of the preparation buffer. Arrhenius plots of P-f vs. 1/T wer
e linear, showing a single activation energy of 4.6 kcal mol(-1). The
initial osmotic response which is significantly retarded is correlated
with the period of elevated hydrostatic pressure. We interpret this a
s an inhibition of P-f caused by membrane strain and suggest how this
inhibition may play a role in cell volume regulation in the proximal t
ubule.