Negotiations over implementation of the Northern Ireland Good Friday Agreem
ents are used to compare predictions made by prospect theory and an expecte
d utility model. The ex ante predictions were made in May 1999 and are eval
uated against developments through August 2000. The study shows that prospe
ct theory is capable of more limited predictions than expected utility mode
ls because the latter can be imbedded in a framework that attends to strate
gic interaction while the former is strictly decision theoretic at this tim
e. Prospect theory proved accurate in 40-70 percent of its predictions, dep
ending on how one interprets the meaning of "implementation." The expected
utility model proved accurate in 100 percent of the issues evaluated here.