Cr. Chien et al., Retrospective comparison of the AJCC 5th edition classification for nasopharyngeal carcinoma with the AJCC 4th edition: an experience in Taiwan, JPN J CLIN, 31(8), 2001, pp. 363-369
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the new AJCC 5th edition cl
assification system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with the AJCC 4th ed
ition by re-evaluating the staging of patients treated in Taiwan.
Methods: From 1992 through 1996, 117 NPC patients without distant metastasi
s were treated using complete courses of radiotherapy. All patients had com
plete CT examinations of the nasopharynx and neck. Each patient was re-stag
ed according to the 5th edition of the AJCC classification system. Their ov
erall survival (OS), loco-regional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), distant m
etastasis-free survival (DMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compare
d between the two staging systems, using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank
test, Wilcoxon test and Cox proportional hazard model.
Results: After a median follow-up of 58.3 months, the 5-year OS for stage I
, II, III and IV was 88, 86, 61 and 48%, respectively, according to the new
staging. A more even distribution of patients was noted among the patients
classified according to the AJCC 5th edition than the 4th edition. The dis
tribution of stages I, II, III and IV was 13.7, 37.6, 15.4 and 33.3%, respe
ctively, using the new staging system, whereas it was 0.8, 14.5, 20.5 and 6
4.2%, respectively, using the old staging system. More statistically signif
icant differences among 5th edition stages and T classifications than the 4
th edition were also noted.
Conclusions: The 5th edition of the AJCC staging system appears to have a m
ore even distribution of patients and more statistically significant differ
ences in predicting prognosis than the 4th edition, mostly in stages and T
classification.