Informational masking in profile analysis: Comparing ideal and human observers

Citation
Vm. Richards et T. Zeng, Informational masking in profile analysis: Comparing ideal and human observers, JARO, 2(3), 2001, pp. 189-198
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Otolaryngology
Journal title
JARO
ISSN journal
15253961 → ACNP
Volume
2
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
189 - 198
Database
ISI
SICI code
1525-3961(200109)2:3<189:IMIPAC>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Predictions from an ideal observer model are compared with human thresholds for two profile analysis tasks. Past work has shown that ideal observer mo dels reasonably account for human thresholds when the profile components ar e fixed in frequency and amplitude. Randomly varying the frequencies of the tones making up the profile leads to higher thresholds. Owing in part to l arge interobserver variation, the ideal observer model is not successful in accounting for the pattern of psychophysical thresholds associated with in creases in frequency uncertainty. The ideal observer also fails to account for the results of a recent profile analysis experiment in which amplitude randomization was studied [Lentz U, Richards VM: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102: 5 35-541, 1998]. Overall, the ideal observer predicts smaller effects of unce rtainty on thresholds than are observed in psychophysical experiments.