Exploring the nursing minimum data set for the Netherlands using multidimensional scaling techniques

Citation
Amgf. Griens et al., Exploring the nursing minimum data set for the Netherlands using multidimensional scaling techniques, J ADV NURS, 36(1), 2001, pp. 89-101
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING
ISSN journal
03092402 → ACNP
Volume
36
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
89 - 101
Database
ISI
SICI code
0309-2402(200110)36:1<89:ETNMDS>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Rationale. To fulfil the need for a systematic collection of nursing data t hat give insight in nursing care and its benefits and costs, a nursing mini mum data set (NMDS) has been developed and validated for Dutch general hosp itals. A NMDS provides data describing the diversity in patient populations and variability in nursing activities that can be analysed in various ways . Aim of the study. To explore and compare the fundamental underlying dimensi ons describing patient problems and nursing interventions in Dutch general hospital wards. Methods. Data of predominantly nominal and ordinal measurement level that w ere collected with the NMDS for The Netherlands on 15 Dutch hospital wards underwent two consecutive steps: first, they were transformed into metric d ata by means of RIDIT (relative to an identified distribution) analysis; se condly, they were analysed by means of multidimensional scaling. Results. Multidimensional scaling techniques yielded a fairly good three-di mensional solution of the NMDS data. Hospital wards could be distinguished from each other on the basis of patient problems and nursing interventions most common on some wards but not on others. The core aspects underlying pa tient problems concerned dependency problems, life threatening problems and endogenous-exogenous problems, while discriminating nursing interventions were cure-care activities, internally-externally oriented activities and ps ychosocial-physical interventions. Limitations. Not all types of hospital wards were represented, which limits the representativity of the results for Dutch general hospitals. Furthermo re, the patient sample size over the 15 wards was relatively small. Conclusion. The constructs are consistent with NMDS findings in Belgium and findings from practice, which contributes to their content validity.