G. Le Goff et J. Noblet, Comparative total tract digestibility of dietary energy and nutrients in growing pigs and adult sows, J ANIM SCI, 79(9), 2001, pp. 2418-2427
Seventy-seven diets were fed to 61-kg growing pigs at a feeding level close
to their ad libitum intake and to nonlactating, nonpregnant sows slightly
above their maintenance energy level (2.4 kg/d). The main objectives of thi
s study were to compare the total tract digestibility of dietary energy or
nutrients of the 77 diets in growing pigs and adult sows and to analyze the
effect of diet chemical composition on total tract digestibility in both g
roups of pigs. Diets were formulated to represent a range of chemical compo
sitions as large as those found in most practical situations. The DE and ME
values and total tract digestible nutrient contents of diets were measured
for each group of animals; each diet was measured in four to five animals
per group, and collection of urine and feces lasted 10 d. The results were
used to establish equations for predicting DE and ME values, total tract di
gestible nutrient contents, and total tract digestibility coefficients of e
nergy from chemical characteristics for each group of animals. The results
show that the total tract digestibility of energy or nutrients was higher (
P < 0.01) in adult sows than in growing pigs; the total tract digestibility
coefficients of energy, crude protein, ether extract, and NDF averaged 85.
2, 85.1,37.1, and 64.4%, respectively, for sows and 82.1, 80.3, 31.6, and 5
6.3%, respectively, for growing pigs. The ME/DE ratio was lower (P < 0.01)
in sows (94.8%) than in growing pigs (96.5%), as a result of higher urinary
energy losses in sows. The difference in DE values (on average, 0.6 MJ/kg
of DM) between adult sows and growing pigs was not constant (P < 0.01) but
increased with dietary fiber content (3.3, 8.6, and 10.1 kJ for each gram o
f NDF, ADF, and crude fiber increase in the diet, respectively), which sugg
ests that the origin of the difference between the two physiological stages
is mainly due to a higher rate of degradation of dietary fiber in the hind
gut of sows. The DE and ME values could be accurately predicted from total
tract digestible nutrients or from chemical characteristics for each physio
logical stage. Equations for predicting urinary energy loss from urinary N
are also proposed. From a practical point of view, it is suggested to use t
wo energy values for pig feeds: one applicable to growing-finishing pigs an
d one to adult sows. Equations for predicting DE in adult sows from energy
values obtained in growing pigs are proposed.