Y. Imai et al., Comparison of lung protection strategies using conventional and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, J APP PHYSL, 91(4), 2001, pp. 1836-1844
This study compared pathophysiological and biochemical indexes of acute lun
g injury in a saline-lavaged rabbit model with different ventilatory strate
gies: a control group consisting of moderate tidal volume (VT) (10-12 ml/kg
) and low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (4-5 cmH(2)O); and three
protective groups: 1) low VT (5-6 ml/kg) high PEEP, 2-3 cmH(2)O greater tha
n the lower inflection point; 2) low VT (5-6 ml/kg), high PEEP (8-10 cmH(2)
O); and 3) high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). The strategy usin
g PEEP > inflection point resulted in hypotension and barotrauma. HFOV atte
nuated the decrease in pulmonary compliance, the lung inflammation assessed
by polymorphonuclear leukocyte infiltration and tumor necrosis factor-alph
a concentration in the alveolar space, and pathological changes of the smal
l airways and alveoli. Conventional mechanical ventilation using lung prote
ction strategies (low VT high PEEP) only attenuated the decrease in oxygena
tion and pulmonary compliance. Therefore, HFOV may be a preferable option a
s a lung protection strategy.