The effects of faking on personality test scores have been studied previous
ly by comparing (a) experimental groups instructed to fake or answer honest
ly, (b) subgroups created from a single sample of applicants or nonapplican
ts by using impression management scores, and (c) job applicants and nonapp
licants. In this investigation, the latter 2 methods were used to study the
effects of faking on the functioning of the items and scales of the Sixtee
n Personality Factor Questionnaire. A variety of item response theory metho
ds were used to detect differential item/test functioning, interpreted as e
vidence of faking. The presence of differential item/test functioning acros
s testing situations suggests that faking adversely affects the construct v
alidity of personality scales and that it is problematic to study faking by
comparing groups defined by impression management scores.