This article examines the characteristics of recent ethnographies of "confl
ict zones," especially those that seek to bring an experience-near depictio
n of violence to the reader. These works are contrasted to older ethnograph
ic treatments of violence. A number of critiques of these works are conside
red, and the article concludes with a discussion of the several roles (meth
odological, conceptual, and moral) that the human rights movement has playe
d in helping to formulate the agenda for the new ethnographies of violence
and conflict.