Objectives: To develop a reproducible method to measure tooth wear and asse
ss the protection given by dentine bonding agents in an erosive/abrasive we
ar regime.
Methods: Seal and Protect (Dentsply, UK) and Optibond Solo (Kerr, UK) were
each applied to 20 extracted teeth and subjected to 3000 cycles in a recipr
ocating erosion/abrasion wear machine. A further 20 teeth, without protecti
on, were subjected to the same wear regime and were either brushed in water
or immersed in acid. Impressions were taken by a standardised technique an
d were scanned with a noncontacting laser profilometer. The amount of erosi
on was measured at the same co-ordinates before and after erosion using 2 m
m diameter metal discs as reference points.
Results: The amount of wear on Seal and Protect had a mean 24.8 mum (SD 57.
4 mum) and for Solo it was 1.4 mum (24.5 mum), and this difference was stat
istically significant (p = 0.02). There was no statistically significant di
fference in the wear measured on the teeth brushed in water or immersed in
acid. The wear measured on the unprotected teeth was 243 mum (SD 120 mum) a
nd was statistically significantly different to the protected surfaces (p =
0.001).
Conclusion: Both Seal and Protect and Solo protected the teeth in this wear
regime and the technique could be used clinically for patients with uncont
rolled dental erosion. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.