C. Prigent et al., Joint characterization of vegetation by satellite observations from visible to microwave wavelengths: A sensitivity analysis, J GEO RES-A, 106(D18), 2001, pp. 20665-20685
This study presents an evaluation and comparison of visible, near-infrared,
passive and active microwave observations for vegetation characterization,
on a global basis, for a year, with spatial resolution compatible with cli
matological studies. Visible and near-infrared observations along with the
Normalized Difference Vegetation Index come from the Advanced Very High Res
olution Radiometer. An atlas of monthly mean microwave land surface emissiv
ities from 19 to 85 GHz has been calculated from the Special Sensor Microwa
ve/Imager for a year, suppressing the atmospheric problems encountered with
the use of simple channel combinations. The active microwave measurements
are provided by the ERS-1 scatterometer at 5.25 GHz. The capacity to discri
minate between vegetation types and to detect the vegetation phenology is a
ssessed in the context of a vegetation classification obtained from in situ
observations. A clustering technique derived from the Kohonen topological
maps is used to merge the three data sets and interpret their relative vari
ations. NDVI varies with vegetation density but is not very sensitive in se
mi-arid environments and in forested areas. Spurious seasonal cycles and la
rge spatial variability in several areas suggest that atmospheric contamina
tion and/or solar zenith angle drift still affect the NDVI. Passive and act
ive microwave observations are sensitive to overall vegetation structure: t
hey respond to absorption, emission, and scattering by vegetation elements,
including woody parts. Backscattering coefficients from ERS-1 are not sens
itive to atmospheric variations and exhibit good potential for vegetation d
iscrimination with similar to 10 dB dynamic range between rain forest to an
d grassland. Passive microwave measurements also show some ability to chara
cterize vegetation but are less sensitive than active measurements. However
, passive observations show sensitivity to the underlying surface wetness t
hat enables detection of wetlands even in densely vegetated areas. Merging
the data sets using clustering techniques capitalizes on the complementary
strengths of the instruments for vegetation discrimination and shows promis
ing potential for land cover characterization on a global basis.