Minimally invasive video-assisted mitral valve repair: Short and mid-term results

Citation
P. Schroeyers et al., Minimally invasive video-assisted mitral valve repair: Short and mid-term results, J HEART V D, 10(5), 2001, pp. 579-583
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE
ISSN journal
09668519 → ACNP
Volume
10
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
579 - 583
Database
ISI
SICI code
0966-8519(200109)10:5<579:MIVMVR>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Background and aim of the study: Port-Access (TM) video-assisted surgery fo r mitral valve repair has become an alternative for mid-sternotomy. However , mid-term results are not yet available. Methods: Between February 1997 and December 1999, 121 patients underwent mi tral valve surgery through a 4- to 5-cm. right anterolateral thoracotomy us ing the Heartport (R) endovascular cardiopulmonary bypass system; among the se patients, 77 (57 males, 20 females; mean age 59 years; range 31-84 years ) underwent mitral valve repair. Severe (4+) mitral regurgitation (MR) was seen in 63 patients (82%). Mean NYHA class was 2.5 +/- 0.4. Standard Carpen tier mitral valve repair procedures were used in all patients; 11 received PTFE chordae for anterior leaflet prolapse. Results: Pathologies were degenerative (n = 69), chronic endocarditis (n = 4), annular dilatation (n = 3) and rheumatic (n = 1). Hospital mortality wa s 1.3% (n = 1). Two patients (2.6%) had conversion to sternotomy for aortic dissection caused by the Endo-Aortic Clamp (TM). Nine patients (11%) under went revision for bleeding. Mean cross-clamp and perfusion times were 103 m in (range: 24-160 min) and 140 min (range: 75-215 min), respectively. Mean hospital stay was eight days (range: 4-36 days). During follow up (mean 31 months; range: 17-51 months) all patients improved their NYRA class; eight (11%) remained in class II. Left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic and LV end- systolic diameters decreased from 61 +/- 7.3 mm. to 53 +/- 6.9 mm (p <0.01) and from 37 +/- 6.8 mm to 34 +/- 6.9 nun (p <0.05), respectively. Sixty-tw o patients (88%) had no or trivial MR, and nine (12%) had moderate MR (2+). There were two late valve replacements for endocarditis, and no late death s. Conclusion: Port-Access (TM) mitral valve repair constitutes a valid altern ative to the standard procedure, and has good mid-term results. Video-assis ted mitral valve repair appears to be safe and reproducible.