Jr. Gonzalez-juanatey et al., Influence of prosthesis size and left ventricular mass on left ventriculardiastolic reserve in patients with aortic valve prostheses, J HEART V D, 10(5), 2001, pp. 611-618
Background and aim of the study: The study aim was to determine the influen
ce of valve size and left ventricular (M mass on long-term LV diastolic res
erve in patients subjected to aortic valve replacement for stenosis.
Methods: Seventy-four patients (33 women, 41 men; mean age 64 years) after
aortic valve replacement with 40 pericardial bioprostheses and 34 bileaflet
mechanical prostheses were studied. All valves were of nominal size 19, 21
or 23 mm. The patients were studied by Doppler echocardiography, at rest a
nd during peak effort, between 12 and 47 months after valve replacement.
Results: All patients achieved significantly increased heart rate, blood pr
essure and cardiac output in response to effort. Effort also significantly
modified transvalvular pressure drops and valve areas. The mean diastolic r
eserve was 29.3 ml, and mean stroke volume reserve 23.2 ml; in neither case
were there any significant differences between valve types, or among valve
sizes.
Conclusion: At about one year after surgery, the diastolic reserve of patie
nts subjected to aortic valve replacement on account of stenosis was consid
erable, and independent of valve size. Despite the persistence of LV hypert
rophy after valve replacement, LV diastolic function during effort was simi
lar to that of the normal heart.