Broad beam vs. flying spot excimer laser: Refractive and videokeratographic outcomes of two different ablation profiles after photorefractive keratectomy
T. Fiore et al., Broad beam vs. flying spot excimer laser: Refractive and videokeratographic outcomes of two different ablation profiles after photorefractive keratectomy, J REFRACT S, 17(5), 2001, pp. 534-541
PURPOSE: To assess the refractive outcomes and videokeratographic patterns
in photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) of two last-generation excimer lasers:
broad beam and flying spot lasers.
METHODS: Forty eyes were treated for a mean myopic correction of -5.59 +/-
2.17 D with a Ladarvision excimer laser (Autonomous Technology Corp). We co
mpared the refractive outcomes and the videokeratographic patterns with tho
se of 40 eyes treated with the Summit Apex Plus laser (Summit Technology In
c) for a mean myopic correction of -5.60 +/- 2.24 D.
RESULTS: During the 6-month follow-up, we found no significant difference i
n uncorrected and spectacle-corrected visual acuity, haze grade, regularity
index, or decentration. The eyes treated by Ladarvision showed a lower ref
ractive error at I month (P = .04), a lower incidence of central islands at
I (P = .003) and 3 months (P = .04), a wider mean effective ablation area
at 1 (P = .0004), 3 (P =.0000009), and 6 months (P = .0000000004), a less s
teep ablation edge at 1 (P = .0026), 3 (P = .015), and 6 months (P = .011).
CONCLUSIONS: The small beam excimer laser provides better videokeratographi
c outcomes, which lead to quicker refractive stability and better visual pe
rformance.