Complications and functional evaluation of 17 saddle prostheses for resection of periacetabular tumors

Citation
P. Cottias et al., Complications and functional evaluation of 17 saddle prostheses for resection of periacetabular tumors, J SURG ONC, 78(2), 2001, pp. 90-100
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
ISSN journal
00224790 → ACNP
Volume
78
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
90 - 100
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-4790(200110)78:2<90:CAFEO1>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Seventeen saddle prostheses were inserted between 1988 and 1997 after resec tion of periacetabular tumors. The tumors involved the zones If and III of Enneking classification in 13 patients, the zones I and II in 2 patients, a nd the zone II in 2 patients. The tumors included 11 chondrosarcomas, 3 Ewi ng sarcomas, 2 giant cells tumors, and 1 metastasis of renal carcinoma. The tumoral resection was wide "en bloc" in 14 cases, marginal in 2 cases, and intratumoral in 1 case. The mean follow-up period of the patients is 42 mo nths ranging from 8 to 84 months. Local recurrences occured in five cases a nd metastases in four cases. Five patients died of tumoral disease and one of intercurrent disease. Complications were observed in 11 cases (65%) incl uding nerve damages (3 cases), deep infections (3 cases), upward migrations of the saddle (4 cases), saddle dislocations (3 cases), sacroiliac subluxa tions (2 cases), and mechanical failures (2 cases). The modified Musculoske letal Tumor Society Score (MSTS) and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (T ESS) were used for functional analysis. Functional results were available f ur only nine patients of the series with a mean MSTS of 17 points ranging f rom 11 to 23 points and a mean TESS of 58 points ranging from 39 to 95 poin ts. The saddle prosthesis provided in all cases of this series an early pai nfree weight-bearing reconstruction with minimal limb shortening, but the f unctional results remained fair in most patients due to a limited range of motion and a poor abductor strength. Surg. Oncol. 2001;78:90-100. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.