Background Groin hernia repair is one of the most frequent operations, but
there is no consensus about surgical or anaesthetic technique. Furthermore,
no nationwide studies have been done. Our aim was to investigate outcome r
esults of groin hernia surgery to improve quality of treatment.
Methods We prospectively recorded 26 304 groin hernia repairs done in Denma
rk from Jan 1, 1998, to June 30, 2000, in a nationwide Danish hernia databa
se.
Findings 93% of all groin herniorrhaphies done in Denmark in the 30 months
of the study were recorded in the database. Kaplan-Meier estimates of reope
ration rates 30 months after anterior mesh repair and laparoscopic repair w
ere significantly lower than after sutured posterior wall repairs in primar
y inguinal hernia (2.2% and 2.6% vs 4.4%; p < 0.0001). Reoperation rates we
re also lower with anterior mesh repair (6.1%; p < 0.0001) and laparoscopic
repair (3.4%; p < 0.0001) than with sutured posterior wall repair (10.6%)
after recurrent hernia. Use of Lichtenstein mesh repair increased from 33%
in January, 1998, to 62% in June, 2000, whereas use of laparoscopic repair
remained constant at about 5%. Kaplan-Meier estimates of reoperation rates
were 2.8% in the first 15 months and 1.6% in the second (p = 0.03). For ele
ctive repairs, only 59% of patients were treated on an outpatient basis, an
d only 18% had local anaesthesia.
Interpretation Mesh repairs have a lower reoperation rate than conventional
open repairs. Systematic prospective recording of treatment and outcome va
riables in a national clinical database improved the overall quality of sur
gical care. However, there is a large potential for cost savings and more e
fficient patient care with extended use of mesh techniques, outpatient surg
ery, and local anaesthesia.