The stock assessment process in the South East Fishery involves scientists,
industry, fishery managers, economists and non-government organizations. A
comparison with such processes in other countries, where stakeholder invol
vement ranges from government scientists only to involvement of scientists,
industry and conservation non-government organizations, suggests that Aust
ralia is the only country in which fishery managers are active and integral
stock-assessment participants. In Australia, as in several other countries
, the form of advice is comparative (consequences of alternative decisions)
rather than prescriptive. Although all approaches have advantages and disa
dvantages, the South East Fishery process has advantages that appear to cle
arly outweigh the disadvantages. The advantages include better communicatio
n among interest groups, improved ownership of and hence support for outcom
es and better interactions among groups. The disadvantages include the cost
of the process, lack of consistency among assessments, vulnerability of sc
ientists and the frustrations of industry.