Repetitive tapping is used to investigate temporal perception, memory, and
reproduction. Intertap intervals and their variability, arise from cognitiv
e and motor processes during the task. We used a measure of readiness poten
tial onset to determine motor component latency during the timed interval.
Subjects performed a paced, two-handed tapping task at four target interval
s (1.5-2.75 s). Overall latency of production increased with increasing ISI
, as did variability across target interval, conforming to a generalized We
ber's law. In contrast, average motor latency was roughly 0.5 s across ISI.
This constant motor latency may also indicate constant variability attribu
table to motor processing. NeuroReport 12:3015-3018 (C) 2001 Lippincott Wil
liams & Wilkins.