Estimation of sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of two serologic tests for the detection of antibodies against Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotype 2 in the absence of a reference test (gold standard)

Citation
C. Enoe et al., Estimation of sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of two serologic tests for the detection of antibodies against Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotype 2 in the absence of a reference test (gold standard), PREV VET M, 51(3-4), 2001, pp. 227-243
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Medicine/Animal Health
Journal title
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE
ISSN journal
01675877 → ACNP
Volume
51
Issue
3-4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
227 - 243
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-5877(20011011)51:3-4<227:EOSSAP>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Latent-class models were used to determine the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of a polyclonal blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent ass ay (ELISA) and a modified complement-fixation test (CFT) when there was no reference test. The tests were used for detection of antibodies against Act inobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotype 2 in a survey of respiratory diseases in Danish finishing pigs. The estimates were obtained by maximum-likelihoo d and also by a Bayesian method (implemented with Gibbs sampling). Possible dependence of diagnostic errors was investigated by comparing models where independence was assumed to models allowing for conditional dependence, gi ven the true disease status. No strong evidence of conditional dependence in either test sensitivity or specificity was found. Assuming independence, maximum-likelihood estimates and 95% confidence intervals of the sensitivity and specificity of the ELIS A were 100% and 92.8% (90.1-95.5%) and the corresponding values of the CFT were 90.6% (85.8-95.4%) and 98.6% (98.0-99.3%), respectively. Bayesian esti mates and posterior 95% credible intervals of the sensitivity and specifici ty of the ELISA were 99.7% (98.7-100%) and 92.7% (89.9-95.3%) and of the CF T were 90.6% (86.0-95.3%) and 98.7% (98.0-99.3%). The sensitivity and speci ficity of a combined test, where the CFT is subsequently applied to the pig sera that test positive in the ELISA, A ere estimated at 90.2% (85.6-95.0% ) and 99.9% (99.8-100%), respectively. The cost of the combined test was le ss than the cost of the use of the CFT alone, at prevalences < 54%. Prevale nces and predictive valued, and their 95% limits were estimated in six sub- samples of data. The estimates of sensitivity and specificity obtained in t he present investigation generally validate those reported from other sourc es. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.