Drug-induced receptor occupancy: substantial differences in measurements made in vivo vs ex vivo

Citation
S. Kapur et al., Drug-induced receptor occupancy: substantial differences in measurements made in vivo vs ex vivo, PSYCHOPHAR, 157(2), 2001, pp. 168-171
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
Volume
157
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
168 - 171
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
Rationale: The number of receptors occupied by a given drug is a central co nstruct in understanding drug action in the brain. Two techniques have been commonly used to measure drug receptor occupancy. In one method, the drug and the radioligand used to measure occupancy compete in vivo while in the other method, the drug is injected into the living animal, the animal kille d and the radioligand competes for available receptors ex vivo. While these methods are often used interchangeably, there has been no systematic compa rison of their sensitivities and consistency. Objectives. In this study, we performed a systematic within-animal comparison of drug-induced receptor o ccupancy as measured by the in vivo vs the ex vivo methods. Methods: We exa mined the occupancy of dopamine D-2 receptors by different doses of the dru g raclopride using the in vivo and and ex vivo autoradiographic methods in the same rat with C-11-raclopride and H-3-raclopride as radioligands, respe ctively. Results: The in vivo method showed a significantly greater sensiti vity and internal consistency while the ex vivo method was less sensitive, and increasingly so as a function of longer incubation times. The lack of s ensitivity was accounted for by the unidirectional, dissociation of the dru g from the receptors in the incubation medium. Conclusions: Our-data sugges t that these two methods are not interchangeable; the ex. vivo method is mu ch less sensitive, lacks internal consistency and hence is best avoided.