Tree mortality, needle biomass recovery and growth losses in Scots pine following defoliation by Diprion pini (L.) and subsequent attack by Tomicus piniperda (L.)
B. Langstrom et al., Tree mortality, needle biomass recovery and growth losses in Scots pine following defoliation by Diprion pini (L.) and subsequent attack by Tomicus piniperda (L.), SC J FOR R, 16(4), 2001, pp. 342-353
Tree mortality and growth losses following insect defoliation are poorly do
cumented in Scandinavia. In 1990-1991, Diprion pini (L.) caused extensive d
efoliation to Scots pine in Lauhanvuori national park and surrounding areas
in south-western Finland. Most trees lost all their foliage in 1990. In 19
91, the outbreak area was sprayed with diflubenzuron (Dimilin (R)), except
in the national park, where trees were severely defoliated again. No furthe
r defoliation occurred in 1992. In spring 1993. sprayed trees had ca 30% fo
liage, whereas unsprayed trees on average carried less than 10% of full fol
iage. The latter trees were susceptible to attack by Tomicus pimperda (L.),
whereas the former largely escaped beetle attack. Beetle attacks peaked in
1993. and depletion of suitable host trees probably terminated the beetle
outbreak in the area. Two years of severe defoliation resulted in substanti
al tree mortality and growth losses. In spring 1997. these unsprayed stands
had suffered a ca. 50% loss in basal area which was mainly because of mort
ality. and about half of the dead trees had been attacked by T. piniperda.
Surviving trees had ca 50% of full foliage, and radial growth had still not
recovered. Basal area growth was reduced by 40-70%, depending on the amoun
t of foliage left after the second year of defoliation. In contrast, tree m
ortality and beetle attack in the sprayed stands were negligible, and these
trees had recovered full foliage and radial growth by spring 1997. Thus, o
ne year of total defoliation resulted in an estimated loss in basal area gr
owth of approximately 30% during ca. 5 yrs. In conclusion, the spraying ope
ration was economically justified, as it prevented substantial tree mortali
ty and reduced growth losses.