Design issues in the combination of international data from two rural community cardiovascular intervention programs

Objectives: To compare and contrast two rural cardiovascular community inte rvention programs (CCIP) in northern Sweden and the US by discussing the me thods used to select and combine similar data from two separately designed and implemented CCIP in order to describe and evaluate their effectiveness in reducing cardiovascular risk. Methods: Two rural intervention populations and their reference populations were compared. A comparison was made of the intensity and duration of the intervention programs using an overall intervention intensity score. Popula tion-based surveys were conducted at 5-year intervals in both countries. Th e methods used for data pooling and comparison are described. A description of statistical analyses using a mixed analysis of variance model is provid ed. Results: The data were pooled, taking into consideration comparable ages. N ew variables were created in order to define the relationship between simil ar data that did not permit direct comparison. Conclusions: Combination and comparison of international data from two prog rams allowed evaluation of community intervention programs that were develo ped independently for similar communities. The effectiveness of interventio ns can be compared using such methods.