Most countries have national programs to increase the public awareness and
understanding of science. The assumption behind these programs is that a sc
ientifically literate population will ultimately lead to a healthy and econ
omically prosperous country. How do we know if these programs achieve their
aims? Are they evaluated, and if so, what methods are used? This report lo
oks at the way the Australian Science and Technology Awareness Program has
been evaluated and comments on the limitations of the methods used. It prop
oses a simple five-point model for evaluation. The conclusion is that the c
redibility of programs designed to enhance the public communication of scie
nce and technology will be questioned and funding threatened unless science
communicators devote more resources to evaluation. On May 30, 2001, the Sc
ience and Technology Awareness Program was replaced by the National Innovat
ion Awareness Strategy. a body with similar responsibilities.