D. Stoffler et G. Ryder, Stratigraphy and isotope ages of lunar geologic units: Chronological standard for the inner solar system, SPACE SCI R, 96(1-4), 2001, pp. 9-54
The absolute ages of cratered surfaces in the inner solar system, including
Mars, are derived by extrapolation from the impact flux curve for the Moon
which has been calibrated on the basis of absolute ages of lunar samples.
We reevaluate the lunar flux curve using isotope ages of lunar samples and
the latest views on the lunar stratigraphy and the principles of relative a
nd absolute age dating of geologic surface units of the Moon. The geologica
l setting of the Apollo and Luna landing areas are described as far as they
are relevant for this reevaluation. We derive the following best estimates
for the ages of the multi-ring basins and their related ejecta blankets an
d present alternative ages for the basin events (in parentheses): 3.92 +/-
0.03 Gyr (or 3.85 +/- 0.05 Gyr) for Nectaris, 3.89 +/- 0.02 Gyr (or 3.84 +/
- 0.04 Gyr) for Crisium, 3.89 +/- 0.01 Gyr (or 3.87 +/- 0.03 Gyr) for Seren
itatis, and 3.85 +/- 0.02 Gyr (or 3.77 +/- 0.02 Gyr) for Imbrium. Our best
estimates for the ages of the mare landing areas are: 3.80 +/- 0.02 Gyr for
Apollo 11 (old surface), 3.75 +/- 0.01 Gyr for Apollo 17, 3.58 +/- 0.01 Gy
r for Apollo 11 (young surface), 3.41 +/- 0.04 Gyr for Luna 16, 3.30 +/- 0.
02 Gyr for Apollo 15, 3.22 +/- 0.02 Gyr for Luna 24, and 3.15 +/- 0.04 Gyr
for Apollo 12. The ages of Eratosthenian and Copernican craters remain: sim
ilar to 2.1 (?) Gyr (Autolycus), 800 +/- 15 Myr (Copernicus), 109 +/- 4 Myr
(Tycho), 50.3 +/- 0.8 (North Ray crater, Apollo 16), and 25.1 +/- 1.2 (Con
e crater, Apollo 14). When plotted against the crater densities of the rele
vant lunar surface units, these data result in a revised lunar impact flux
curve which differs from the previously used flux curve in the following re
spects: (1) The ages of the stratigraphically most critical impact basins a
re notably younger, (2) the uncertainty of the calibration curve is decreas
ed, especially in the age range from about 4.0 to 3.0 Gyr, (3) any curve fo
r ages older than 3.95 Gyr (upper age limit of the Nectaris ejecta blanket)
is abandoned because crater frequencies measured on such surface formation
s cannot be correlated with absolute ages obtained on lunar samples. Theref
ore, the impact flux curve for this pre-Nectarian time remains unknown. The
new calibration curve for lunar crater retention ages less than about 3.9
Gyr provides an updated standard reference for the inner solar system bodie
s including Mars.