Coase, spatial pricing and self-organising cities

Modern computational techniques offer new horizons for urban economics in t he form of agent-based simulation frameworks. This paper reports on a cellu lar automata (CA) simulation in which urban land transforms on the basis of locally optimal bargaining between developers and local communities (local governments). Because CA is an explicitly spatial modelling methodology, t he space-time-specific paths to global equilibrium can be observed. Because it is an atomistic methodology (cells represent decision units), it is sui table for articulating microeconomic theories of urban processes including planning. We present a space-time-specific simulation of cities evolving un der two alternative planning regimes. In one, the community has property ri ghts and uses planning conditions, planning gain, impact fees and so on to ensure that each development occurs at a socially optimal density. This is a theoretically simplified rendition of the British development control sys tem-simplified in the sense of acting from a position of perfect knowledge and having a single objective of optimising locational externalities. In th e other simulation, developers have the right to develop but the community is allowed to make (rather than receive) compensatory payments in order to achieve socially optimal land-use patterns and densities. Decision-making i n both systems is local and socially efficient. However, case-by-case ad ho c development control with compensatory exactions has the effect of steerin g development to the least-polluting locations. Although socially optimal d ensities can occur under alternative control regimes (as the second simulat ion demonstrates), the stylised British development control process acts li ke a decentralised locational pricing system and, by definition, yields a s uperior land-use pattern than any other style of planning system. At one le vel, our model articulates the Coasian invariance theorem-the same partial equilibrium outcome can be achieved whichever way the property rights (over land development) fall. At another level, the results demonstrate that in a spatial resource allocation problem such as land-use planning, global equ ilibrium is not independent of property rights. The total social product in the urban land economy is greater when the community holds rights over dev elopment.