Rationale and Objectives. Patients presenting with ischemic brain symptoms
have widely variable outcomes dependent to some degree on the pathologic ba
sis of their stroke syndrome. The purpose of this study was to determine th
e cost implications of the emergency use of a computed tomographic (CT) pro
tocol comprising unenhanced CT, head and neck CT angiography, and whole-bra
in CT perfusion.
Materials and Methods. By using a retrospective patient database from a ter
tiary care facility and publicly available cost data, the authors derived t
he potential savings from the use of CT angiography, CT perfusion, or both
at hospital arrival by means of a cost model. The cost of the CT angiograph
y-CT perfusion protocol was determined from Medicare reimbursement rates an
d compared with that of traditional imaging protocols. Cost savings were es
timated as a decrease in the length of stay for most stroke patients, where
as the most benign (lacunar) strokes were assumed to be managed in a nonacu
te setting. Misdiagnosis cost (erroneously not admitting a patient with non
lacunar stroke) was calculated as the cost of a severe complication. Sensit
ivity testing included varying the percentage of misdiagnosed patients and
admitting patients with lacunar stroke.
Results. The nationwide net savings that would result from the adoption of
the CT angiography-CT perfusion protocol are in the $1.2 billion range (-$1
54 million to $2.1 billion) when patients with lacunar strokes are treated
nonacutely and $1.8 billion when those patients are admitted for acute care
.
Conclusion. The results demonstrate the potential effect of implementing a
CT angiography-CT perfusion protocol. In particular, prompt CT angiography-
CT perfusion imaging could have an effect on the cost of acute care in the
treatment of stroke.