K. Engelhard et al., Effects of remifentanil/propofol in comparison with isoflurane on dynamic cerebrovascular autoregulation in humans, ACT ANAE SC, 45(8), 2001, pp. 971-976
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Background: This study investigates the effects of remifentanil and propofo
l in comparison to isoflurane on dynamic cerebrovascular autoregulation in
humans.
Methods: In 16 awake patients dynamic cerebrovascular autoregulation was me
asured using transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD). Thereafter patients wer
e intubated, ventilated with O-2/air (FiO(2)=0.33) and randomly assigned to
one of the following anesthetic protocols: group I (n=8): 0.5 mug . kg(-1)
. min(-1) remifentanil combined with a propofol-target plasma concentratio
n of 1.5 mug . ml(-1); group 2 (n=8): 1.8 % isoflurane (1.5 MAC). Following
20 min of equilibration the autoregulatory challenge was repeated. Arteria
l blood gases and body temperature were maintained constant over time. Stat
istics: Mann-Whitney U-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Results: Dynamic autoregulation was intact in all patients prior to inducti
on of anesthesia expressed by an autoregulatory index (ARI) of 5.4 +/- 1.21
(mean +/- SD, group 1) and 5.9 +/- 0.98 (mean +/- SD, group 2). With remif
entanil/propofol anesthesia dynamic auto-regulation was similar to the awak
e state (group 1: ARI= 4.9 +/- 0.88). In contrast, autoregulatory response
was delayed with 1.5 MAC isoflurane (group 2, ARI=2.1 +/- 0.92) (P <0.05).
Conclusion: These data show that dynamic cerebrovascular autoregulation is
maintained with remifentanil-based total intravenous anesthesia. This is co
nsistent with the view that narcotics (and hypnotics) do not alter the phys
iologic cerebrovascular responses to changes in MAP. In contrast, 1.5 MAC i
soflurane delays cerebrovascular autoregulation compared to the awake state
.