Regression of left ventricular remodeling in chronic heart failure: Comparative and combined effects of captopril and carvedilol

Citation
Rs. Khattar et al., Regression of left ventricular remodeling in chronic heart failure: Comparative and combined effects of captopril and carvedilol, AM HEART J, 142(4), 2001, pp. 704-713
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
ISSN journal
00028703 → ACNP
Volume
142
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
704 - 713
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-8703(200110)142:4<704:ROLVRI>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Background This study evaluated the independent and combined effects of cap topril and carvedilol on left ventricular remodeling in chronic heart failu re. Although angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and P-blockers are kn own to attenuate the remodeling process in chronic heart failure, a direct comparison of these agents has not been performed. Methods We investigated 57 patients with mild to moderate chronic heart fai lure (48 ischemic, 9 nonischemic) who were randomized in a double-blind fas hion to treatment with carvedilol or captopril at maximum doses of 25 mg tw ice daily for 3 months, followed by 3 months of combined treatment. Serial echocardiography, right heart catheterization, and treadmill exercise testi ng were performed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. After exclusions, 49 patients were evaluated during monotherapy and 48 during combination thera py. Results Carvedilol monotherapy produced significant reductions in end-systo lic volume, leading to a greater median increase in ejection fraction compa red with captopril monotherapy (4.7% vs 1.5%, respectively; P < .05). Each drug caused similar reductions in left ventricular mass, chamber sphericity , and pulmonary artery wedge pressure during monotherapy and combined treat ment. Adjunctive treatment with carvedilol produced a trend toward a greate r increase in ejection fraction (4.3% vs 2.7%, respectively; P not signific ant) and significantly greater reductions in the wall thickening score inde x than with captopril (0.25 vs 0.08, respectively; P = .0-4). Conclusions Although angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy did no t alter left ventricular volume, treatment with carvedilol was associated w ith reductions in chamber volume; both drugs reduced left ventricular mass and sphericity. These beneficial effects on remodeling may help to explain the relative prognostic benefits of these therapies.