SIMULTANEOUS DEMONSTRATION OF INFECTIOUS PANCREATIC NECROSIS VIRUS (IPNV) AND FLAVOBACTERIUM-PSYCHROPHILUM IN PARAFFIN-EMBEDDED SPECIMENS OF RAINBOW-TROUT ONCORHYNCHUS-MYKISS FRY BY USE OF PAIRED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY
O. Evensen et E. Lorenzen, SIMULTANEOUS DEMONSTRATION OF INFECTIOUS PANCREATIC NECROSIS VIRUS (IPNV) AND FLAVOBACTERIUM-PSYCHROPHILUM IN PARAFFIN-EMBEDDED SPECIMENS OF RAINBOW-TROUT ONCORHYNCHUS-MYKISS FRY BY USE OF PAIRED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY, Diseases of aquatic organisms, 29(3), 1997, pp. 227-232
The Gram-negative bacterium Flavobacterium psychrophilum, which is the
causative agent of rainbow trout fry syndrome (RTFS), and infectious
pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV), the causative agent of infectious pa
ncreatic necrosis (IPN), are both highly pathogenic for rainbow trout
fry. Several 'persistent' cases of RTFS have been observed concomitant
with IPNV. Cultivation alone might not be sufficient for evaluation o
f the disease situation as both pathogens can be cultivated from fish
that do not show any clinical signs of disease. In such cases it may b
e difficult to decide which pathogen should be considered the primary
cause of the mortality observed. Further, it may be difficult to culti
vate the bacterium in later stages of the disease or from dead fish th
at have been transported without cooling. In the case of (suspected) d
ouble infections it is therefore suggested that immunohistochemistry b
e included as a supplementary diagnostic tool, allowing correlation of
the presence of either pathogen with pathological lesions. In the pre
sent study, fry representing different stages of RTFS from 3 clinical
outbreaks were shown to suffer from ongoing double infections as demon
strated by immunohistochemistry and supported by cultivation of the 2
pathogens. The general finding was that single cells of the exocrine p
ancreas were positive for the virus, whereas bacteria were mainly demo
nstrated in the interstitial tissue surrounding the pancreatic islets.
In some endothelial cells of the head kidney, both pathogens were det
ected in the same cell. These findings as well as various protocols in
relation to the methodology are discussed.