Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis - Specificity of symptoms and perfusion defects at baseline and duringanticoagulant therapy
P. Girard et al., Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis - Specificity of symptoms and perfusion defects at baseline and duringanticoagulant therapy, AM J R CRIT, 164(6), 2001, pp. 1033-1037
To determine the specificity of pulmonary embolism (PE) symptoms and lung s
can perfusion defects in patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT), we analy
zed data on 400 patients with phlebography-proven proximal DVT included in
a prospective trial. As the incidence of PE during anticoagulant therapy wa
s the main outcome measure of the trial, all patients underwent lung scanni
ng and/or pulmonary angiography within 48 h of inclusion, and then whenever
PE was suspected. Angiography was recommended in patients with nondiagnost
ic lung scan. At baseline, the presence or absence of PE could be ascertain
ed in 350 patients (87.5%), and 197 (56%) had PE. Sensitivity and specifici
ty of symptoms for PE were 74 and 67%, respectively. Among 37 patients with
symptoms and nondiagnostic lung scan, only 8 (22%) had PE at angiography.
During anticoagulant therapy (3 mo), there were 29 events suspicious for PE
, mostly (53%) within 2 wk of inclusion. Repeated perfusion studies with co
mparison to baseline tests excluded PE in 21 cases. Cumulated 3-mo risks of
suspected and confirmed on-treatment PE were 6.8% (95% CI, 5.4-8.2%) and 2
.0% (95% CI, 0.6-3.4%) respectively. even in patients with known proximal D
VT, PE symptoms are unspecific and careful imaging studies are needed for d
iagnosis, both at baseline and during anticoagulant therapy.