As. Bellows et al., Macrohabitat and microhabitat affinities of small mammals in a fragmented landscape on the upper Coastal Plain of Virginia, AM MIDL NAT, 146(2), 2001, pp. 345-360
We analyzed macrohabitat and microhabitat associations of four soricid and
five rodent species in five macrohabitats on the Coastal Plain of Virginia.
There were no significant differences in total small mammal abundance amon
g macrohabitat types based on total captures/unit effort. However, abundanc
es of four species, Cryptotis parva, Reithrodontomys humulis, Microtus penn
sylvanicus and Zapus hudsonius, were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in old
fields than in four forested habitats. Canonical correspondence analysis r
evealed that 27% of the variation in small mammal distributions was attribu
table to microhabitat characteristics. Three characteristics that had a par
ticular influence on small mammal presence in forested habitats were shrub
frequency (Sorex longirostris), canopy openness (S. hoyi) and diameter of d
owned woody debris (S. hoyi, Blarina brevicauda, Microtus pinetorum). Corre
lations between small mammals and microhabitat characteristics are due to l
ocal moisture gradients and structural heterogeneity. Lack of correlations
between Peromyscus leucopus and any microhabitat characteristic is due to t
he ability of this species to obtain requirements from a variety of sources
. Preservation of microhabitat characteristics like downed woody debris and
understory vegetation, and certain macrohabitats (e.g., old fields), would
require minimal management effort and provide suitable habitat for a diver
se small mammal fauna in fragmented landscapes.