Drug-induced amnesia is a separate phenomenon from sedation - Electrophysiologic evidence

Citation
Ra. Veselis et al., Drug-induced amnesia is a separate phenomenon from sedation - Electrophysiologic evidence, ANESTHESIOL, 95(4), 2001, pp. 896-907
Citations number
45
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ANESTHESIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00033022 → ACNP
Volume
95
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
896 - 907
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-3022(200110)95:4<896:DAIASP>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Background: Sedative-hypnotic drugs not only increase sedation, but also im pair memory as serum concentration increases. These drugs also produce prof ound changes in the auditory event-related potential (ERP). The ability of various ERP components to predict changes in sedation and memory produced b y various drugs was tested. Methods: Sixty-five healthy volunteers randomly received intravenous placeb o, midazolam, propofol, thiopental, fentanyl with ondansetron, or ondansetr on alone at five different stable target concentrations (three increasing, two decreasing) rising a computer-controlled infusion pump to produce varyi ng degrees of sedation without loss of consciousness. ERPs were recorded wh ile volunteer participants detected a deviant auditory stimulus and made a button-press response to a target tone (standard oddball paradigm, 80:20 ra tio, to elicit a P3 response). At each target concentration, volunteers lea rned a list of 16 words. The predictive probabilities (P-k) of various ERP components were deter-mined for word recognition at the end of the day (mem ory) and log reaction time to the deviant stimulus (sedation). Results: The N2 latency of the ERP consistently predicted log reaction time in all groups (P-k +/- SE from 0.58 +/- 0.04 to 0.71 +/- 0.04). The N2P3 a mplitude of the ERP was the best predictor of memory performance for midazo lam (P-k, 0.63 +/- 0.04), propofol (P-k, 0.62 +/- 0.05), and thiopental (P- k, 0.66 +/- 0.04). There was a differential ability to predict memory perfo rmance from sedation for midazolam and propofol. Conclusions: Midazolam and propofol affect memory differentially from their sedative effects, and these are indexed by specific components of the audi tory ERP. These components of the ERP are associated with specific, but not necessarily unique, neuroanatomic structures. Thus, these drugs act by add itional mechanisms beyond general central nervous system depression to prod uce the effects of sedation and memory impairment.