Study objective: Timely diagnosis of a pericardial effusion is often critic
al in the emergency medicine setting, and echocardiography provides the onl
y reliable method of diagnosis at the bedside. We attempt to determine the
accuracy of bedside echocardiography as performed by emergency physicians t
o detect pericardial effusions in a variety of high-risk populations.
Methods: Emergency patients presenting with high-risk criteria for the diag
nosis of pericardial effusion underwent emergency bedside 2-dimensional ech
ocardiography by emergency physicians who were trained in ultrasonography.
The presence or absence of a pericardial effusion was determined, and all i
mages were captured on video or as thermal images. All emergency echocardio
grams were subsequently reviewed by the Department of Cardiology for the pr
esence of a pericardial effusion.
Results: During the study period, a total of 515 patients at high risk were
enrolled. Of these, 103 patients were ultimately deemed to have a pericard
ial effusion according to the comparative standard. Emergency physicians de
tected pericardial effusion with a sensitivity of 96% (95% confidence inter
val [CI] 90.4% to 98.9%), specificity of 98% (95% Cl 95.8% to 99.1%), and o
verall accuracy of 97.5% (95% Cl 95.7% to 98.7%).
Conclusion: Echocardiography performed by emergency physicians is reliable
in evaluating for pericardial effusions; this bedside diagnostic tool may b
e used to examine specific patients at high risk. Emergency departments inc
orporating bedside ultrasonography should teach focused echocardiography to
evaluate the pericardium.