Background. Our study evaluates a series of video-assisted minimally invasi
ve mitral operations, showing safe progression toward totally endoscopic te
chniques.
Methods. Consecutive patients with isolated mitral valve disease underwent
either manually directed (n = 55) or voice-activated robotically directed (
n = 72) video-assisted mitral operations. Cold blood cardioplegia, a transt
horacic aortic clamp, a 5-mm endoscope, and a 5-cm. minithoracotomy were us
ed. This video-assisted minimally invasive mitral operation cohort was comp
ared with a previous sternotomy-based mitral operation cohort (n = 100).
Results. Group demographics, New York Heart Association classification, and
cardiac function were similar. Repairs were performed in 61.8% manually di
rected (n = 34), 75.0% robotically directed (n = 54), and 54% sternotomy-ba
sed (N = 54) mitral operations. The robotically directed technique showed a
significant decrease in blood loss, ventilator time, and hospitalization c
ompared with the sternotomy-based technique. Manually directed mitral opera
tions compared with robotically directed mitral operations had decreased ar
rest times (128.0 +/- 4.5 minutes compared with 90.0 +/- 4.6 minutes; p < 0
.001) and decreased perfusion times (173.0 +/- 5.7 minutes compared with 14
4.0 +/- 4.6 minutes; p < 0.001). In the minimally invasive mitral operation
cohort, complications included reexploration for bleeding (2.4%; n = 3) an
d one stroke (0.8%), whereas the 30-day mortality was 2.3% (n = 3).
Conclusions. Video-assisted mitral surgery provides safe and effective resu
lts when compared with conventional sternal approaches. These positive resu
lts show a safe and stepwise evolution toward a totally endoscopic mitral v
alve operation. (C) 2001 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.