M. Holmer et al., The importance of mineralization based on sulfate reduction for nutrient regeneration in tropical seagrass sediments, AQUATIC BOT, 71(1), 2001, pp. 1-17
Nutrient dynamics (nitrogen and phosphate), sediment organic matter mineral
ization (sulfate reduction rates) and stable carbon isotope composition in
two tropical seagrass sediments were studied at a intertidal sandflat of Ba
n Pak Klok, Thailand. The seagrass beds were composed of meadows of Cymodoc
ea rotundata (Ehrenb. and Hempr.) Aschers and Thalassia hemprichii (Ehrenb.
) Aschers. The nutrient concentrations in porewaters were low (< 1 muM NO2-
+ NO3- 30-70 muM NH4+ and 2-5 muM PO43-) in the low-organic sediments (<0.
6% DW POC and <0.03% DW PON). Sulfate reduction rates were significantly hi
gher in the C. rotundata sediments (6.6 mmol m(-2) per day), whereas there
was no difference between rates in the T. hemprichii and bare sediments (2.
1 and 2.2 mmol m(-2) per day). The depth distribution of sulfate reduction
rates in C. rotundata sediments was positively correlated with the below-gr
ound biomass suggesting that the enhanced anaerobic activity was due to sup
ply of microbial substrates from the seagrasses. The stable isotopic compos
ition of the sediment bacteria resembled the seagrasses suggesting that the
bacteria used organic matter derived from the seagrasses. A two-compartmen
t experiment showed that both seagrasses released organic compounds from th
e roots (7.0 and 5.4% of photosynthetic rate for C. rotundata and T. hempri
chii, respectively), and that the loss was sufficient to support the measur
ed sulfate reduction rates. The contribution of sulfate reduction to nutrie
nt availability was, however, low supporting only 6-22% of the nutrient dem
and, except for PO43- in C. rotundata sediments where 81% of the demand was
covered by sulfate reduction. The relatively high nutrient content of the
seagrasses (1.5-2.0% DW N and 0.18-0.20% DW P) suggested that their growth
was not limited by nutrients. The low contribution of sulfate reduction to
nutrient availability thus indicates that other mineralization processes or
uptake of nutrients from the water column are important for plant growth.
(C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V All rights reserved.