Efficacy of an implanted neuroprosthesis for restoring hand grasp in tetraplegia: A multicenter study

Citation
Ph. Peckham et al., Efficacy of an implanted neuroprosthesis for restoring hand grasp in tetraplegia: A multicenter study, ARCH PHYS M, 82(10), 2001, pp. 1380-1388
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
ISSN journal
00039993 → ACNP
Volume
82
Issue
10
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1380 - 1388
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9993(200110)82:10<1380:EOAINF>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate an implanted neuroprosthesis that allows tetraplegic users to control grasp and release in 1 hand. Design: Multicenter cohort trial with at least 3 years of follow-up. Functi on for each participant was compared before and after implantation, and wit h and without the neuroprosthesis activated. Setting: Tertiary spinal cord injury (SCI) care centers, 8 in the United St ates, 1 in the United Kingdom, and 1 in Australia. Participants: Fifty-one tetraplegic adults with C5 or C6 SCIs. Intervention: An implanted neuroprosthetic system, in which electric stimul ation of the grasping muscles of 1 arm are controlled by using contralatera l shoulder movements, and concurrent tendon transfer surgery. Assessed part icipants' ability to grasp, move, and release standardized objects; degree of assistance required to perform activities of daily living (ADLs), device usage; and user satisfaction. Main Outcome Measures: Pinch force; grasp and release tests; ADL abilities test and ADL assessment test; and user satisfaction survey. Results: Pinch force was significantly greater with the neuroprosthesis in all available 50 participants, and grasp-release abilities were improved in 49. All tested participants (49/49) were more independent in performing AD Ls with the neuroprosthesis than they were without it. Home use of the devi ce for regular function and exercise was reported by over 90% of the partic ipants, and satisfaction with the neuroprosthesis was high. Conclusions: The grasping ability provided by the neuroprosthesis is substa ntial and lasting. The neuroprosthesis is safe, well accepted by users, and offers improved independence for a population without comparable alternati ves.