Ph. Peckham et al., Efficacy of an implanted neuroprosthesis for restoring hand grasp in tetraplegia: A multicenter study, ARCH PHYS M, 82(10), 2001, pp. 1380-1388
Objective: To evaluate an implanted neuroprosthesis that allows tetraplegic
users to control grasp and release in 1 hand.
Design: Multicenter cohort trial with at least 3 years of follow-up. Functi
on for each participant was compared before and after implantation, and wit
h and without the neuroprosthesis activated.
Setting: Tertiary spinal cord injury (SCI) care centers, 8 in the United St
ates, 1 in the United Kingdom, and 1 in Australia.
Participants: Fifty-one tetraplegic adults with C5 or C6 SCIs.
Intervention: An implanted neuroprosthetic system, in which electric stimul
ation of the grasping muscles of 1 arm are controlled by using contralatera
l shoulder movements, and concurrent tendon transfer surgery. Assessed part
icipants' ability to grasp, move, and release standardized objects; degree
of assistance required to perform activities of daily living (ADLs), device
usage; and user satisfaction.
Main Outcome Measures: Pinch force; grasp and release tests; ADL abilities
test and ADL assessment test; and user satisfaction survey.
Results: Pinch force was significantly greater with the neuroprosthesis in
all available 50 participants, and grasp-release abilities were improved in
49. All tested participants (49/49) were more independent in performing AD
Ls with the neuroprosthesis than they were without it. Home use of the devi
ce for regular function and exercise was reported by over 90% of the partic
ipants, and satisfaction with the neuroprosthesis was high.
Conclusions: The grasping ability provided by the neuroprosthesis is substa
ntial and lasting. The neuroprosthesis is safe, well accepted by users, and
offers improved independence for a population without comparable alternati
ves.