Md. Cravioto et al., A MULTICENTER COMPARATIVE-STUDY ON THE EFFICACY, SAFETY, AND ACCEPTABILITY OF THE CONTRACEPTIVE SUBDERMAL IMPLANTS NORPLANT(R) AND NORPLANT(R)-II, Contraception, 55(6), 1997, pp. 359-367
In order to assess efficacy, safety, and acceptability of the contrace
ptive subdermal implants Norplant(R) and Norplant(R)-II in Mexican wom
en, a comparative phase III clinical trial was undertaken in eight cli
nics across the country. The study involved 1052 women who were follow
ed-up trimonthly for three years. Cumulative pregnancy rates were 0.29
% and 0.34% for Norplant and Norplant-II implants, respectively. Simil
ar overall cumulative discontinuation rates were observed at three yea
rs: 50.38% for Norplant capsules, and 50.44% for Norplant-II rods. The
main method-related reason for termination was endometrial bleeding i
rregularity which led to discontinuation rates of 11.94% and 11.62% fo
r Norplant and Norplant-II contraceptive systems, respectively. In 15,
279 woman-months of experience accumulated with Norplant implants and
14,092 with Norplant-II implants, there were few adverse events report
ed. No difference was found between the two groups in either difficult
y for implants placement and removal or women's discomfort, even thoug
h the time required for insertion and removal of Norplant capsules was
longer than for Norplant-II rods. It is concluded that during the fir
st three years of use, both implants systems are equally effective, sa
fe, and acceptable. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved
.