Objective: To assess and compare the reliability and validity of the Hought
on Scale, the Prosthetic Profile of the Amputee Locomotor Capabilities Inde
x (PPA-LCI), and the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) mobility sub
scale, 3 disease-specific self-report measures of functional mobility for l
ower extremity prosthetic mobility.
Design: Four-week test-retest: 1 sample for reliability analyses, 1 sample
for validity analyses.
Setting: University-affiliated outpatient amputee clinic, in Ontario, Canad
a.
Participants: Two outpatient amputee samples (sample 1 [n = 55], for reliab
ility analysis; sample 2 [n = 329], for validity analysis).
Interventions: Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures: Test-retest of reliability and convergent validity o
f the 3 scales. Convergent validity and discriminative ability were also as
sessed after setting a priori hypotheses for 2 scales of walking performanc
e, balance confidence, and other indicators of ambulatory ability.
Results: The reliability of the PPA-LCI (intraclass correlation coefficient
[ICC] = .88) was slightly higher than the Houghton Scale (ICC = .85) and t
he PEQ mobility subscale (ICC = .77). The PPA-LCI was prone to high ceiling
effects (40%) that would limit its ability to detect improvement. Evidence
for convergent validity, when compared with the 2-Minute Walk Test, Timed
Up and Go, and the Activity-Specific Balance Confidence Scale, was supporte
d as hypothesized in all the scales. Each of the scales was able to discrim
inate between different groups for amputation cause, walking distance, mobi
lity device use, and automatism, with each having varying strength related
to relative precision. The Houghton Scale was the only scale able to distin
guish between amputation levels.
Conclusions: Reliability and validity of all the scales are acceptable for
group level comparison. None of the scales had clearly superior psychometri
c properties compared with the others. Further research is required to asse
ss responsiveness.