Results on the coronal heating function seem to strongly depend on the empl
oyed type of multitemperature modeling along the line of sight. Instruments
with broadband temperature filters cause more temperature confusion than t
hose with narrowband temperature filters. A possible bias of broadband filt
ers is the hydrostatic weighting of multitemperature loop systems, which mi
mic a temperature increase with altitude and thus yield a preference for lo
optop heating. In this Letter we revisit a loop system previously analyzed
by Priest et al., for which they found that the coronal heating is likely t
o be uniform in the temperature range between 1.6 and 2.2 MK. As an alterna
tive scenario, we use standard hydrostatic solutions here (with vanishing c
onductive flux in the transition region). We show that hydrostatic solution
s with a uniform heating function throughout the corona and transition regi
on lead to unphysical solutions for the column depth and the altitude of th
e loop footpoints, while a footpoint-heating model yields acceptable physic
al solutions for a heating scale height of s(H) approximate to 13 +/- Mm. T
he positive temperature gradient with height (which is also found in filter
- ratio temperatures of other Yohkoh data) can be explained by the hydrosta
tic weighting bias resulting from hot loops (T-max approximate to 2.6 MK) e
mbedded in a cooler (T-max approximate to 1.0 MK) background corona.