V. Guiyedi et al., Evaluation of efficacy and tolerance of amodiaquine versus chloroquine treatment on children with umcomplicated P-falciparum malaria in Gabon, B S PATH EX, 94(3), 2001, pp. 253-257
We conducted a prospective study from September 1997 to January 1998 in Lib
reville (Gabon). Fifty-three (53) children with uncomplicated P. falciparum
malaria were included and divided into two groups. The first group (27 pat
ients) was treated with amodiaquine and the second (26 patients) with chlor
oquine. The efficacy and tolerance of amodiaquine 30 mg/kg base over 3 days
(10 mg/kg daily) and chloroquine 25 mg/kg base over 3 days (10 mg/kg day 0
, 10 mg/kg day 1, 5 mg/kg day 3) were estimated at days 7 and 14. Clinical
examination and parasitaemia were assessed on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 7, 14. Haema
tological and biochemical parametres were determined on days 0 and 7. Amodi
aquine was shown to be more effective than chloroquine in clinical response
and ridding patients of parasites. adequate clinical response was signific
antly higher with amodiaquine than chloroquine [100% (27/27) versus 45% (91
20), p < 0,0005]. Rates for early treatment failure (ETF) and late treatmen
t failure (LTF) were respectively 35% and 12% with chloroquine. The parasit
ological success rate was significantly higher with amodiaquine than chloro
quine on days 7 [93% (25/27) versus 62% (13/21), p < 0.008] and 14 [100% (1
3/13) versus 44% (4/9), p < 0,01]. The RI resistance type was 7% in the amo
diaquine group, The rate of in vivo chloroquino-resistance was 53%, essenti
ally of RII and RIII type. Overall, the two drugs were well tolerated.