B. Brans et al., The anti-tumoral activity of neoadjuvant intra-arterial I-131-lipiodol treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: A pilot study, CANC BIO R, 16(4), 2001, pp. 333-338
Background: The high recurrence rate after curative resection has stimulate
d the development of adjuvant treatment modalities, such as local embolizat
ion. This study was set up to investigate the anti-tumoral potential of neo
-adjuvant I-131-lipiodol administration before liver transplantation.
Methods: In this preliminary, prospective study we treated 10 consecutive H
CC patients by intra-arterial injection of I-131-lipiodol into the hepatic
artery followed by liver transplantation within 1-9 months (mean 3.4). Afte
r hepatic catheterization, 1332-2146 MBq (mean 1887 MBq) or 36-58 mCi (mean
51 mCi) was instilled as selective as possible, depending on the distribut
ion of the tumors: non-selectively in the hepatic artery propria (n = 4), s
electively in the right and/or left hepatic artery (n = 3) or superselectiv
ely in segmental arteries (n = 3).
Results: Anti-tumoral activity was regarded as obvious vith 1) a strong dec
rease of alfa-fetoprotein (AFP), comparing the highest recorded value befor
e and after I-131-lipiodol and/or 2) a downstaging in TNM classification on
the posttherapy MRI as compared to the pre-therapy MRI and/or 3) tumors wi
th > 50% necrosis on histo-pathology of the explanted liver, without previo
us chemoembolization. Either of these criteria were met by 5/10 (50%) of pa
tients. A 4) downstaging in pTNM classification on histopathology compared
to the TNM classification of the MRI and/or a 5) tumor necrosis of only 10-
50% were regarded as possibly tumor-related but were not accepted as a sing
le criteria of anti-tumoral activity. This was seen in 3/10 (30%) of patien
ts. Clinical side-effects of the I-131-lipiodol therapy were generally mild
with a temperature rise in two cases, nausea without vomiting in another t
wo and upper back pain in one patient. In one patient progressive liver fai
lure developed one week after I-131-lipiodol therapy, necessitating prematu
re liver transplantation after 4 weeks.
Conclusion: With the use of stringent anti-tumoral criteria, this study sho
ws evidence of an anti-tumoral effect in 50% of patients. Our data support
the evaluation on larger patient numbers to confirm the promising anti-tumo
ral activity of I-131-lipiodol in HCC patients candidated for liver transpl
antation.