Comparative investigation of proliferation markers and their prognostic relevance in human meningiomas

Citation
Sh. Torp et al., Comparative investigation of proliferation markers and their prognostic relevance in human meningiomas, CLIN NEUR, 20(5), 2001, pp. 190-195
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology
Journal title
CLINICAL NEUROPATHOLOGY
ISSN journal
07225091 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
190 - 195
Database
ISI
SICI code
0722-5091(200109/10)20:5<190:CIOPMA>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Objective: In human meningiomas, histology alone does not always predict th e clinical outcome. Proliferative activity has therefore, become a potentia l tool in the histopathological grading of these tumors. The aim of this st udy was to investigate different Ki67 antibodies on meningiomas, to compare their proliferation indices (PI) and with other proliferation markers, suc h as S-phase fraction and mitotic activity, and to see whether these factor s correlate with histological tumor grade. Material and methods: The study included 43 meningiomas graded according to the criteria of WHO and Jaaske- lainen et al. [1985, 1986]. Paraffin sections were used for immunohistochem ical detection of Ki67 antigen and flow-cytometric determination of S-phase fraction. Results: The PIs displayed an overall increase with increasing h istological grade, however, the range of values for benign, atypical and an aplastic meningiomas were wide, resulting in considerable overlap between t he groups. There were for the most significant correlations between the dif ferent proliferation markers. Conclusions: Ki67-equivalent antibodies and S phase fraction have no advantage over counting mitoses to assess the proli ferative activity in meningiomas. Thus, mitotic activity justifies its role in meningioma grading.