Two recent placebo-controlled trials of cotrimoxazole in HIV-infected adult
s, conducted by independent groups but in the same city (Abidjan, Cote d'Iv
oire), have both shown important positive impacts. One study where cotrimox
azole or placebo was given to tuberculosis-HIV co-infected patients showed
a significant reduction in mortality; the second study with a similar proto
col, in HIV-infected patients without major co-morbidity at trial entry, sh
owed a significant reduction in morbidity but no effect on mortality. These
data have been interpreted by some as conclusive enough to recommend cotri
moxazole for all people with HIV/AIDS in Africa, Others have been more caut
ious, noting that Abidjan has an atypically low rate of cotrimoxazole resis
tance among bacterial pathogens, and consider more data are needed before s
uch a sweeping policy decision can be made. Recent data from Senegal showed
no benefit but this trial, like several others, was terminated prematurely
because the investigators felt it unethical to continue after the Abidjan
results were released. The situation is somewhat confused and confusing. Th
is review attempts to put the current debate into context and to review the
current position of cotrimoxazole in relation to other primary prophylaxis
strategies in Africa. Curr Opin infect Dis 14:507-512. (C) 2001 Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins.