Outcomes of cytopathology studies presented at national pathology meetings

The purpose of this study was to determine what factors influence the final publication status of cytopathology studies presented at national meetings , Abstracts involving cytopathology material were obtained from the followi ng journals: Modem Pathology (volume 11, 1998), Acta Cytologica (volume 42, 1998), and the American Journal of Clinical Pathology (volumes 109 and 110 , 1998). Using the National Library of Medicine Website, each abstract was searched by author and topic to determine if the study was published as a p eer-reviewed article. The following parameters were evaluated meeting where the abstract was presented, type of institution where the research was bas ed, type of material used in the study, and application of ancillary techni ques used in the study. The subsequent published articles were evaluated fo r journal and time to publication. Out of 257 studies presented in 1998, 85 (33%) were published in peer-reviewed journals by May 2000. The majority o f papers were published in Diagnostic Cytopathology (n = 21), Acta Cytologi ca (n = 15), and Cancer (n = 18). The mean time for publication was 12.8 mo . The highest percentage of published studies was presented at the United S tates and Canadian Academy of Pathology (USCAP) meeting (50% of presented a bstracts), followed by American Society of Cytopathology (ASC) (28%) and Am erican Society of Clinical Pathologists (ASCP) (17%) meetings. Ancillary te chniques were applied in 40 of 85 (47%) published studies, 27 of 85 (32%) a rticles focused on morphology, and 18 of 85 (21%) papers covered other topi cs (e.g., quality, assurance (QA), cost, and role of cytology). In nonpubli shed studies (n = 172), special techniques were the main focus in 40%, morp hology in 25%, and other topics in 35% of abstracts. The great majority (97 %) of published studies were from academic institutions. Gynecological and nongynecological material were roughly equally covered in published and non published studies. Only, a relatively small percentage of presented studies was finalized in the form of peer-reviewed articles. Type of material and application of ancillary techniques do not significantly influence the outc ome. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.