Single-session pre-dialysis counseling program does not improve short-termoutcomes of CAPD patients

Citation
Mc. Law et al., Single-session pre-dialysis counseling program does not improve short-termoutcomes of CAPD patients, DIALYSIS T, 30(10), 2001, pp. 666
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
DIALYSIS & TRANSPLANTATION
ISSN journal
00902934 → ACNP
Volume
30
Issue
10
Year of publication
2001
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-2934(200110)30:10<666:SPCPDN>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
A multidisciplinary education program is an attractive approach for improvi ng the quality of care of pre-dialysis patients. However, it is not known w hether this kind of program can reduce the need for urgent dialysis and/or hospitalizations in patients who subsequently receive continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). In October 1995, we began a multidisciplinary pre-dialysis education program for patients with plasma creatinine levels > 500 mu mol/L or creatinine clearances < 15 ml/min. The program involved a s ingle-session, intensive, educational presentation and discussion pertainin g to the initiation of dialysis, modality selection, and access creation. From October 1995 to December 1997, 145 patients were enrolled in the CAPD program at our center, 67 of whom that had attended this pre-dialysis couns eling program were included in this study (PDP group). Their short-term mor bidity was compared to 58 CAPD patients who were referred late to a nephrol ogist during the same period (LR group). They were also compared to 51 CAPD patients enrolled from January 1993 to September 1995 who received standar d outpatient nephrology care prior to dialysis (SC group). All three groups of patients were comparable with regard to age, sex, underlying renal dise ase, and comorbid conditions. ne LR group showed a higher incidence of requ iring urgent dialysis (86.2% vs. 50.7% and 60.8% for the PDP and SC groups, respectively, p<0.001). The LR group also required more hospitalizations d uring the first 6 months of dialysis (median = 25 days, vs. 16 and 15 days for the PDP and SC groups, respectively, p <0.001). There was no difference with regard to the need for urgent dialysis or hospitalizations between pa tients in the PDP and SC groups. There were no differences among the three groups with regard to the rate of peritonitis, exit site infections, or hem oglobin, albumin, phosphate, and parathyroid hormone levels. We conclude that in a referral hospital setting, a single-session, intensiv e, pre-dialysis counseling program offers no additional advantage in short- term patient outcome over standard outpatient nephrology care. Repeated exp lanation and follow-up education are necessary. Since a significant proport ion of pre-dialysis patients is referred late to a nephrologist, education programs targeted to primary care physicians and other medical specialists are important.