Kj. Gutzwiller et Wc. Barrow, Bird-landscape relations in the Chihuahuan Desert: Coping with uncertainties about predictive models, ECOL APPL, 11(5), 2001, pp. 1517-1532
During the springs of 1995-1997, we studied birds and landscapes in the Chi
huahuan Desert along part of the Texas-Mexico border. Our objectives were t
o assess bird-landscape relations and their interannual consistency and to
identify ways to cope with associated uncertainties that undermine confiden
ce in using such relations in conservation decision processes. Bird distrib
utions were often significantly associated with landscape features, and man
y bird-landscape models were valid and useful for predictive purposes. Diff
erences in early spring rainfall appeared to influence bird abundance, but
there was no evidence that annual differences in bird abundance affected mo
del consistency. Model consistency for richness (42%) was higher than mean
model consistency for 26 focal species (mean 30%, range 0-67%), suggesting
that relations involving individual species are, on average, more subject t
o factors that cause variation than are richness-landscape relations. Consi
stency of bird-landscape relations may be influenced by such factors as pla
nt succession, exotic species invasion, bird species' tolerances for enviro
nmental variation, habitat occupancy patterns, and variation in food densit
y or weather. The low model consistency that we observed for most species i
ndicates the high variation in bird-landscape relations that managers and o
ther decision makers may encounter.
The uncertainty of interannual variation in bird-landscape relations can be
reduced by using projections of bird distributions from different annual m
odels to determine the likely range of temporal and spatial variation in a
species' distribution. Stochastic simulation models can be used to incorpor
ate the uncertainty of random environmental variation into predictions of b
ird distributions based on bird-landscape relations and to provide probabil
istic projections with which managers can weigh the costs and benefits of v
arious decisions. Uncertainty about the true structure of bird-landscape re
lations (structural uncertainty) can be reduced by ensuring that models mee
t important statistical assumptions, designing studies with sufficient stat
istical power, validating the predictive ability of models, and improving m
odel accuracy through continued field sampling and model fitting. Uncertain
ty associated with sampling variation (partial observability) can be reduce
d by ensuring that sample sizes are large enough to provide precise estimat
es of both bird and landscape parameters. By decreasing the uncertainty due
to partial observability, managers will improve their ability to reduce st
ructural uncertainty.