Ja. Schneider et al., Geotechnical site characterization in the greater Memphis area using cone penetration tests, ENG GEOL, 62(1-3), 2001, pp. 169-184
The determination of seismic ground hazards in Memphis and Shelby County, T
ennessee is facilitated by the use of electronic cone penetration tests tha
t can provide up to four independent readings with depth from a single soun
ding. One series of soundings is being performed for site-specific mapping
to determine the presence and extent of potentially-liquefiable sediments,
in-situ soil resistance to liquefaction, and initial soil stiffness for gro
und motion amplification studies. Another series of soundings is being cond
ucted in conjunction with field paleoliquefaction mapping in the New Madrid
seismic zone to better define the intensity, magnitude, and geographic ext
ent of ground failures caused by large past earthquake events, as well as i
nformation about the source sands. In this paper, an overview is given on t
he types of multi-channeled penetrometer data that are being collected, inc
luding vertical profiles of cone tip stress (q(t)), sleeve friction (f(s)),
penetration porewater pressure (u(1) or u(2)) downhole shear wave velocity
(V-s) and/or electrical conductivity (k(c)). Representative soundings are
presented from select sites to illustrate repeatability, data post-processi
ng methods, and that derived downhole V-s profiles are generally in good ag
reement with non-invasive surface techniques at two Memphis test sites. Cyc
lic stress based procedures for liquefaction are discussed with relation to
data from a paleoliquefaction site in Germantown, Tennessee, and estimates
of the minimum magnitude of the historic event are discussed. While estima
tes of the earthquake magnitude are preliminary pending additional study on
attenuation relationships and site response in the deep soils of the Missi
ssippi Embayment, it is inferred from evaluation of in-situ test data using
cyclic stress based techniques that the December 1811 New Madrid earthquak
e was likely larger than a M-W = 7.5 event. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V.
All rights reserved.