Comparison of thallium-201 exercise SPECT and dobutamine stress echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block
I. Tandogan et al., Comparison of thallium-201 exercise SPECT and dobutamine stress echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block, INT J CARDI, 17(5), 2001, pp. 339-345
The present study assessed and compared the diagnostic accuracy of thallium
-201 (Tl-201) exercise myocardial single photon emission computerised tomog
raphy (SPECT) and dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) for detection of
coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with left bundle branch block (L
BBB). Study population consisted of 26 consecutive patients with permanent
LBBB who were suffering from chest pain. Patients (8 women, 18 men mean age
= 57 +/- 8 years) were studied with DSE, Tl-201 SPECT and coronary angiogr
aphy (CAG). Three different approaches for diagnosis of CAD were used to id
entify CAD in left arterial descending (LAD) coronary artery territories in
scintigraphic studies: (1) Approach A (conventional approach): involvement
of septal, and/or anterior, and/or apical wall. (2) Approach B: involvemen
t of anterior and septal wall irrespective of apical wall. (3) Approach C:
involvement of septum, anterior and apical wall. DSE gave a sensitivity of
91%, specificity of 92% and accuracy of 92% for diagnosis of CAD in the LAD
coronary artery territory. Tl-201 SPECT (conventional approach) gave a sen
sitivity of 100%, specificity of 42% and diagnostic accuracy of 69% for dia
gnosis of CAD in the LAD coronary artery territory. Sensitivity, specificit
y and diagnostic accuracy of approach C were 33, 85 and 57% respectively. T
he specificity of Tl-201 SPECT significantly increased in approach C when c
ompared with approach A and B (p < 0.02). However sensitivity of the Tl-201
SPECT with approach C showed significant decrease when compared with DSE a
nd approach A and B (p < 0.005). Specificity of DSE for diagnosis of CAD in
LAD were significantly higher than those of Tl-201 SPECT regarding the app
roach A and B (p < 0.01). In conclusion the use of DSE for diagnosis of CAD
in patients with LBBB seems to be more suitable than Tl-201 SPECT.