Comparison of thallium-201 exercise SPECT and dobutamine stress echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block

Citation
I. Tandogan et al., Comparison of thallium-201 exercise SPECT and dobutamine stress echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block, INT J CARDI, 17(5), 2001, pp. 339-345
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
ISSN journal
15695794 → ACNP
Volume
17
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
339 - 345
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-9899(200109)17:5<339:COTESA>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
The present study assessed and compared the diagnostic accuracy of thallium -201 (Tl-201) exercise myocardial single photon emission computerised tomog raphy (SPECT) and dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) for detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with left bundle branch block (L BBB). Study population consisted of 26 consecutive patients with permanent LBBB who were suffering from chest pain. Patients (8 women, 18 men mean age = 57 +/- 8 years) were studied with DSE, Tl-201 SPECT and coronary angiogr aphy (CAG). Three different approaches for diagnosis of CAD were used to id entify CAD in left arterial descending (LAD) coronary artery territories in scintigraphic studies: (1) Approach A (conventional approach): involvement of septal, and/or anterior, and/or apical wall. (2) Approach B: involvemen t of anterior and septal wall irrespective of apical wall. (3) Approach C: involvement of septum, anterior and apical wall. DSE gave a sensitivity of 91%, specificity of 92% and accuracy of 92% for diagnosis of CAD in the LAD coronary artery territory. Tl-201 SPECT (conventional approach) gave a sen sitivity of 100%, specificity of 42% and diagnostic accuracy of 69% for dia gnosis of CAD in the LAD coronary artery territory. Sensitivity, specificit y and diagnostic accuracy of approach C were 33, 85 and 57% respectively. T he specificity of Tl-201 SPECT significantly increased in approach C when c ompared with approach A and B (p < 0.02). However sensitivity of the Tl-201 SPECT with approach C showed significant decrease when compared with DSE a nd approach A and B (p < 0.005). Specificity of DSE for diagnosis of CAD in LAD were significantly higher than those of Tl-201 SPECT regarding the app roach A and B (p < 0.01). In conclusion the use of DSE for diagnosis of CAD in patients with LBBB seems to be more suitable than Tl-201 SPECT.