Aim-To determine whether the introduction of a standard reporting proforma
has led to an improvement in the completeness of histopathology reports for
breast cancer excision specimens.
Methods-A standard reporting proforma was designed using the Royal College
of Pathologists' minimum dataset for breast cancer histopathology reports a
nd the national histopathology reporting form of the National Health Servic
e (NHS) breast screening programme. This was introduced into our department
in June 1999, with reports generated from the proforma replacing the stand
ard text reports. The pathological information contained in 50 text reports
issued before the introduction of the proforma and 50 reports generated us
ing the proforma, was compared with the minimum dataset and NHS breast scre
ening programme guidelines.
Results-A general improvement in documentation of individual pathological f
eatures was noted after introduction of the proforma. This was most signifi
cant in relation to documentation of features, such as microcalcification a
nd ductal carcinoma in situ. In addition, important features such as tumour
grade, tumour size, and hormone receptor status were documented more frequ
ently in the proforma group. There was an overall increase in the number of
reports regarded as complete after introduction of the proforma.
Conclusions-The introduction of a standard proforma led to a significant im
provement in the completeness of breast cancer histopathology reports in th
is centre, but continued vigilance is needed to ensure that standards conti
nue to improve.