The authors respond to comments made by P. M. Veach (2001) and M. Ellis (20
01) regarding their research articles on supervision conflict and counterpr
oductivity. Their findings are unique in that they provide qualitative pers
pectives on trainee experiences of negativity in supervision. Some of the c
riticism directed toward their study seemed grounded in positivistic episte
mology, and they address the differences between that perspective and a mor
e meaning-making approach to data analysis. The authors' studies point out
that the supervision relationship has the potential to harm trainees. Couns
eling psychology and related fields need to define skill-based competencies
in supervision that can be observed and measured, including relationship-m
anagement competencies. Training of supervisors should emphasize the develo
pment of clinical skills that permit them to build strong supervisory allia
nces and manage conflicts in supervision.